Random Thoughts on Letterboxing

November 29th, 2009

Over the past several months I’ve been analyzing letterboxing a bit — what makes a good box? what frustrates people? where do things fall apart? is it all about the journey? the stamp? Certainly the letterboxing experience is different for each person and even for the same person when in their own neighborhood where things are familiar and time is not limited versus when traveling and there is no knowledge of local landmarks, limited time and perhaps no online access, so any conclusions are of course generalizations based on my personal experience and objectives. That being said, a couple of things I have found/will be keeping in mind going forward…

- First and foremost, who is my audience? is the box I am planting intended for locals or for vacationers? this distinction makes a lot of difference in terms of type of box, placement and the presentation of clues.

- In general, I have found that travelers tend to like series of boxes in established places — i.e. a 4 box series in a state park is much more likely to tempt most travelers than 4 individual boxes located at places that are only locally known and not found on a map.

- While I am generally planted firmly in the school of thought that the journey is just as rewarding/important as the destination (or in the case of letterboxing, the box), when traveling, the pendulum does tend to swing the other way in correlation with the amount of time I have and I am particularly disappointed to find missing boxes when the hike itself provided little enjoyment or interest.

- When faced with limited time, I tend to choose boxes based on planter and find record… yes, I admit it. While I am one who wishes the “find record” had never been implemented in the first place, since it is there, I do use it when choosing boxes — why spend the few hours I have looking for a box that 5 people have been unable to find? Sure, there is a part of me that sees that as a challenge, but based on experience, the likelihood is far greater that the box is missing than that the last 5 people to look for it just weren’t so good at finding boxes. As for choosing based on planter — I am drawn to names I recognize, people who post to the lists, people I have met in person at gatherings, people who have found my boxes and sent me an email… while I realize I may be missing out on some great boxes from letterboxers who are new or just play under the radar, there is a feeling that involved boxers probably tend to maintain their boxes better (though not always true).

- There is little excuse for poorly maintained boxes. While I understand and accept the thinking that it is not necessary to provide finders with an up-to-the-minute status, I am less tolerant when it comes to maintaining boxes. When you plant a box, it is your responsibility to check on it periodically, keep the clues current with the surroundings and keep the box in good order… if you don’t have the time to keep up with all of your boxes, you have too many boxes (even if it is just a single box). In keeping with this, I am not a proponent of planting a box while visiting a place you do not get back to at least once a year, unless you are able to enlist assistance from local letterboxers in keeping the box maintained. All this being said, I admit I am guilty of letting my boxes go and admit I have more boxes than I can keep up with — this is my primary goal going forward, to scale back to a manageable number of accessible boxes that are kept in good order.

- I am more convinced than ever that ambiguous clues are evil — particularly when the guessing game is at the end of the hunt. I don’t mind if there is research I need to do to decipher the clues or find the starting point (I actually enjoy this); I don’t even mind if the clues require a certain amount of reasoning skills once I am on the trail (as long as this is the type of figuring one can do while out in the woods, away from a computer), but I absolutely abhor when I get to the end of the clue, am in the “vicinity” of where the box should be, but am given no idea as to where I should be looking for the box. At this point I feel like a geocacher and am torn between “I’ve come all this way and don’t want to go away empty-handed” and “do I really want to tear up this area more than the 15 people who were here before me already have?” I generally think like a letterboxer and ask myself “where would I put a box if I were hiding it right here?” and if a check of those places yields no box, I leave empty-handed, as disappointing as that may be. I do make exception to this thinking in the case of mystery boxes where the finder entered into the hunt with the understanding that they were facing a significant challenge *and* where searching the final area does not have an adverse affect on the environment, although I still think it is best to put the mystery elements at the front end of the search rather than the back end.

- Ink pads do not belong in letterboxes. Period.

- Placing a letterbox behind a tree covered by a small pile of leaves, bark and sticks is just asking for your box to go missing. If you’re going to plant a box, take the time to find a secure hiding spot. While we beg and complain about “rehiding better than you found it” the fact is that some people don’t, not to mention you cannot control nature itself — animals, the wind, etc. Find a place where the box is not going to be completely exposed if a muggle comes along, finds the box and just sets it back down where he found it… [sturdy] hollow stumps — either standing or fallen, rock crevices, hollow knots in trees, tree roots, log piles, fallen trees and limbs (large enough that they are not easily moved), etc.

- While I delight in finding skillfully crafted hand-carved stamps, I realize stamp-carving is not every letterboxer’s forte. However, I personally would rather find a very rudimentary hand-carved stamp than a store-bought stamp, unless the store-bought stamp is unique and specifically suited to the location or theme of the box.

- Lock-n-locks are great and while they do keep boxes safer and drier, you still need to put the contents in baggies inside the box. On the other hand, outer bags do more harm than good.

Nothing profound… just organizing my thoughts and thinking out loud.


8 Comments...

  1. by TrailTroll on December 1, 2009 at 7:08 am  

    I agree with everything you said! I am also guilty of having a few neglected boxes - I don’t have near as many plants as you do, but some of my far-away boxes need more attention than I’m willing to give. I’ve retired a couple, and there are some more on the chopping block.

    Great observations!

  2. by Atom118 on December 1, 2009 at 3:28 pm  

    Wonderful observations. I think I agree with all of them, and yes, I’m guilty of a few, as well.

    Recently we’ve been giving these, and other points, alot more thought as we seem to find alot more poorly planted boxes and hikes. As for point 2, I think there is a linked contradiction. A 4 mile series of 4 boxes will be less popular than 4 drive-bys in the most random areas (on a map or otherwise) even if it requires driving around and about for an additional hour.

  3. by Familyof6 on December 1, 2009 at 4:59 pm  

    Great observations, and I too have been guilty of some and have been pulling some of my boxes because of this. I especially agree with the “sticks behind the tree” thing (It seems I’ve been finding LOTS of these lately!). Really though, I’m a snob about a good clue and a great hand-carved stamp. It’s my drug…my own little piece of crack. Hey! I admit it! :-)

  4. by Safari Man on December 3, 2009 at 8:39 pm  

    Well said and glad to see you on A.Q.
    SM

  5. by LockWench on December 4, 2009 at 12:56 pm  

    Hear hear! An excellent commentary on our illustrious hobby. I remember when I did not hide boxes well in the beginning..I have definately learned a lot over the past 5 yrs. I gave up a lot of my boxes and had them adopted when I moved to CT but was disappointed when I returned a year later and virtually no maintenance had been done on my adopted boxes. I began to take ownership back and now am busy replacing lost stamps, replacing logbooks etc. A lot of work, but for the decent boxes it is worth it. For the not so decent boxes ( not the greatest of hiding spots, I mean) I just retire them. Not worth it to me to recarve a stamp more than twice.

    Another comment..I know find restrictions are unpopular but I admit I use them. When I was one of the only planters in my area I didnt mind people “practicing” on my boxes. But since there are a lot of planters around me lately I have put higher find counts on my boxes and let other boxes take the early hits. Hey, it’s hard to maintain over 300 boxes and I use mostly lock and locks (camoed by me) and other expensive materials, so it’s definately helped. I feel like having my boxes pop up on a list after they’ve logged 10 or 25 finds is a nice little surprise and several people have written to me that they appreciate that. It’s kind of a reward for sticking with the hobby, you know? I know I always like it when I qualify for new boxes. What say you?

    LW PhD
    “Nice Counts”

  6. by NorseGnome on December 4, 2009 at 10:17 pm  

    Amen to that part about not wanting to chicken-scratch up the destination like a geocacher. When you get to the end of the hunt, we feel the clues should direct you to the precise location of the box. While we don’t mind having to think it through (look in the spout of the teapot); we hate having to guess about what the planter might mean–near the small tree quite a while after you pass the big rock a little ways from the last trail.

  7. by Anonymous on February 3, 2010 at 3:47 pm  

    i respectfully disagree with some of your thoughts.

    agree: hand carved stamps - will not pass by store bought either, tend to base finding stamps on if it was found last

    disagree: placement, ink pads, tough clues

    remember, all letterboxes have different target audiences. with this said, i will find those that are able to be deciphered, able to find while keeping others, as well as myself alive, and that i am physically able to do.

  8. by letterboxbabes on September 9, 2010 at 5:24 pm  

    We are very VERY new to letterboxing but…WE AGREE WITH EVERY SINGLE THOUGHT YOU’VE SHARED! Some of the things you mentioned caused us to think, “hmmmmm…am I doing that?” Thanks for the seasoned insight and confirmation of things we have wondered about and the things we weren’t sure if we were right about. So far we have MORE plants than FINDS!! We are addicted BAD! See you at the Viva Grand Haven Gathering! ;-D

    housepitality hostess & shooting stars (letterboxbabes)

Leave a Comment

Name (required)

Email (required)

Website



Comments RSS